[1.3.18] Aristotle on Continence, Incontinence (Akrasia), Impetuosity and Weakness

Aristotle (384-322 BC) in the Nicomachean Ethics writes about a personality typology grounded on the state of mind (rational part), and desire (affective part – see also [1.3.6]), and the power relation of these two faculties. Based on these main attributes, he defines four main types, and with further analysis, two sub-types of personalities.

The OntoUML diagram below presents the personality traits of Aristotelian ethics:

Aristotle on happiness, virtuous activity and golden mean
ClassDescriptionRelations
Person A human person 
VirtuousPerson“Like anyone who has developed a skill in performing a complex and difficult activity, the virtuous person takes pleasure in exercising his intellectual skills. Furthermore, when he has decided what to do, he does not have to contend with internal pressures to act otherwise. He does not long to do something that he regards as shameful; and he is not greatly distressed at having to give up a pleasure that he realizes he should forego.”
A virtuous person has his/her mind in a very good-, while desire in an ordered state.
is Person
ContinentPerson“some are typically better able to resist these counter-rational pressures than is the average person. Such people are not virtuous, although they generally do what a virtuous person does. Aristotle calls them ‘continent’ (enkratês).”
An incontinent person has his/her mind in a decent-, while desire in an ordered state, but mind rules desire.
is Person; relates to (always does) VirtuousActivity
IncontinentPerson“others are less successful than the average person in resisting these counter-pressures. They are ‘incontinent‘ (akratês)…
Aristotle distinguishes two kinds of akrasia: impetuosity (propeteia) and weakness (astheneia).”
A continent person has his/her mind in a decent-, while desire in an ordered state, but desire rules mind.
is Person; relates to (sometimes does) VirtuousActivity
ImpetuosPerson“the impetuous person [propeteia] does not go through a process of deliberation and does not make a reasoned choice; he simply acts under the influence of a passion. At the time of action, the impetuous person experiences no internal conflict. But once his act has been completed, he regrets what he has done. One could say that he deliberates, if deliberation were something that post-dated rather than preceded action; but the thought process he goes through after he acts comes too late to save him from error.” IncontinentPerson
WeakPerson “The person who is weak [astheneia] goes through a process of deliberation and makes a choice; but rather than act in accordance with his reasoned choice, he acts under the influence of a passion.” IncontinentPerson
EvilPerson“there is a type of agent [person] who refuses even to try to do what an ethically virtuous agent would do, because he has become convinced that justice, temperance, generosity and the like are of little or no value. Such people Aristotle calls evil (kakosphaulos). He assumes that evil people are driven by desires for domination and luxury, and although they are single-minded in their pursuit of these goals, he portrays them as deeply divided, because their pleonexia—their desire for more and more—leaves them dissatisfied and full of self-hatred.”is Person
VirtueAristotle distinguishes two kinds of virtue: “those that pertain to the part of the soul that engages in reasoning (virtues of mind or intellect), and those that pertain to the part of the soul that cannot itself reason but is nonetheless capable of following reason (ethical virtues, virtues of character).” characterizes VirtuousPerson and VirtuousActivity
VirtuousActivity “Aristotle asks what the ergon (“function”, “task”, “work”) of a human being is, and argues that it consists in activity of the rational part of the soul in accordance with virtue… consists in doing something, not just being in a certain state or condition. It consists in those lifelong activities that actualize the virtues of the rational part of the soul. (see [1.3.4])

Sources

  • All citations from:  Kraut, Richard, “Aristotle’s Ethics”The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.